Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Baker v. Nelson, 409 U.S. 810 (1972)

    Uploaded by

    Michael Ginsborg
    7K views1 page
    Baker v. Nelson, 409 U.S. 810 (1972)

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Baker v. Nelson, 409 U.S. 810 (1972)

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7K views1 page

    Baker v. Nelson, 409 U.S. 810 (1972)

    Uploaded by

    Michael Ginsborg
    Baker v. Nelson, 409 U.S. 810 (1972)

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    MEMORANDUM CASES

    65

    o. 71-1027. Richard John Baker et al., No. 71-1681. Surety Savings & Loan As-
    appellants, v Gerald R. Nelson sociation, appellant, v Wisconsin De-
    partment of Transportation, Division of
    409 US 810, 34 L Ed 2d 65, 93 S Ct 37. Highways
    October 10, 1972. Appeal from the 409 US 810, 34 L Ed 2d 65, 93 S Ct 63.
    Supreme Court of Minnesota. The appeal
    is dismissed for want of a substantial fed- October 10, 1972. Appeal from the Su-
    eral question. preme Court of Wisconsin. The appeal is
    dismissed for want of a substantial federal
    Same case below, 291 Minn 310, 191 NW question.
    2d 185,
    Same case below, 54 Wis 2d 438, 195
    NW2d 464.

    No. 71-1132. Mayor and City Council of


    Baltimore et al., appellants, v John E. No. 72-61. Snohomish County Board of
    Silver et ux. Equalization et al., appellants, v Wash-
    409 US 810, 34 L Ed 2d 65, 93 S Ct 38, ington State Department of Revenue et
    al.
    October 10, 1972. Appeal from the
    Court of Appeals of Maryland. The ap- 409 US 810, 34 L Ed 2d 65, 93 S Ct 68.
    peal is dismissed for want of a substantial October 10, 1972. Appeal from the Su-
    federal question. preme Court of Washington. The appeal
    Same case below, 263 Md 439, 283 A2d is dismissed for want of a substantial fed-
    788. eral question.
    Same case below, 80 Wash 2d 262, 493
    P2d 1012.

    No. 71-1445. Arlen Specter, etc., appel-


    lant, v C. Delores Tucker, Secretary of
    the Commonwealth, et al. No. 72-88. Mesa Verde Company, appel-
    lant, v The Board of County Commis-
    409 US 810, 34 L Ed 2d 65, 93 S Ct 44. sioners of the County of Montezuma et
    October 10, 1972. Appeal from the Su- al.
    preme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern 409 US 810, 34 L Ed 2d 65, 93 S Ct 69.
    District. The appeal is dismissed for
    want of a substantial federal question. October 10, 1972. Appeal from the Su-
    preme Court of Colorado. The appeal is
    Same case below, 448 Pa 1, 293 A2d 15. dismissed for want of a substantial fed-
    eral question.
    Same case below, 495 P2d 229.

    No. 71-1530. Donald Retza, appellant, v


    Raymond B. Fortune
    No. 72-91. Sheldon Davis, appellant, v
    409 US 810, 34 L Ed 2d 65, 93 S et 50. New York
    October 10, 1972. Appeal from the 409 US 811, 34 L Ed 2d 65, 93 S Ct 69.
    Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga
    County. The appeal is dismissed for want October 10, 1972. Appeal from the Ap-
    of a substantial federal question. pellate Term of the Supreme Court of
    [34 L Ed 2(1]-5

    You might also like